These days there’s not much that’s easy to find any more but I still poke around the family tree from time to time just in case. This week I was looking at a couple of the more problematic gaps, specifically Roelof Anderson from Harrismith whose birth I haven’t been able to find, and my similarly named Swedish ancestor Roelof Andriesz/Andriesen who fetched up at the Cape in the mid eighteenth century, probably via the Dutch East India Company. Anyway, I found a couple of references to his (Andriesz’s) second wife Rosina Arends but didn’t know how to find the actual documents online. Step forward the South African Genealogy Facebook group who are quite remarkable – post any reference and, if it’s available, someone will post a link to it in the comments, usually within minutes and I’m inordinately thankful for that.
On a more negative note, I’m still getting very frustrated by my very occasional forays into the murky world of others’ online trees. Many assert relationships with no source information, especially annoying if it’s someone I’m looking for! If I’m not sure of a link I very rarely add it and if I do I include loud caveats; I just wish others would do the same. There’s also a huge amount of frankly wrong information still circulating about my ancestry in trees that has been shown to be false years ago, most of which seem to be on those more collaborative sites like My Heritage and Geni but also on Ancestry (who are now promoting Geneanet, another such site). It’s too easy for people to accept other’s work as gospel without checking, I know I did it in the past but now I’ve turned off Member Trees in Hints even if sometimes I’m tempted to see if someone else has found something new.